Skip to main content
EditionEnglish edition·Édition française
Investigation

The Five Kings of the Pentagon

Five companies, one customer, $771 billion in five years. Lockheed Martin, RTX, Northrop Grumman, Boeing Defense and General Dynamics — the private firms that have become permanent organs of the American state. Meet the five men at the top.

Key findings

  1. Private contractors received about $2.4 trillion in Pentagon contracts between 2020 and 2024 — 54% of the Defense Department's total discretionary spending. Hartung & Semler, Quincy Institute / Costs of War (Brown University), July 2025
  2. Just five firms took $771 billion of that — Lockheed Martin ($313B), RTX, Boeing, General Dynamics and Northrop Grumman — more than twice the $356 billion spent on diplomacy, development and humanitarian aid in the same period. Hartung & Semler, July 2025 (constant FY2025 dollars)
  3. Lockheed Martin alone posted $72.1 billion in defense revenue in the 2025 ranking year, keeping the global #1 spot; RTX $46B, General Dynamics $39.4B, Northrop Grumman $37B, Boeing Defense $35.7B. Defense News Top 100, 2025
  4. The top 100 defense firms combined for $700 billion in defense revenue — up 11.3% from $629 billion the prior year. Defense News Top 100, 2025
  5. Record backlogs lock in the future. RTX alone held a $268 billion backlog; Lockheed $194B; the five primes' combined order books approach $800 billion — years of revenue already sold. Company filings and industry tallies, 2025
  6. Eisenhower's 1961 warning reads as understatement. Sixty-five years after the "military-industrial complex" speech, the complex has a balance sheet. AOAV analysis; historical record
  7. The five chiefs: James Taiclet (Lockheed Martin), Christopher Calio (RTX), Kathy Warden (Northrop Grumman), Kelly Ortberg (Boeing), Phebe Novakovic (General Dynamics). Company disclosures, 2025–2026

The Pentagon has a private sector.

Not a contractor base — a private sector. Between 2020 and 2024, more than half of every dollar the United States Department of Defense was allowed to spend went to private companies: about $2.4 trillion, according to researchers William Hartung of the Quincy Institute and Stephen Semler of Brown University's Costs of War project, in figures adjusted to constant FY2025 dollars. And within that river of money, five firms stand in the middle of the current and drink deepest: Lockheed Martin, RTX, Boeing, General Dynamics and Northrop Grumman — $771 billion in five years.

For perspective, that is more than twice what America spent on diplomacy, development and humanitarian aid over the same period: $356 billion. The country chose to invest over twice as much in weapons manufacturing as in peacebuilding. This investigation maps the five primes: how much they take, what they sell, and who runs them.

The $771 billion table

The Hartung–Semler report, published in July 2025, is the definitive ledger of the post-Afghanistan era. Its central finding: there was no peace dividend. The Biden administration increased Pentagon budgets after the 2021 withdrawal, and the flow continued. Fifty-four percent of DoD discretionary spending — contracts, not salaries, not operations — went to private firms. Of that, the lion's share went to the five primes, with Lockheed Martin alone securing $313 billion over five years.

Chart 1 · The ledger

Contracts vs. diplomacy: the five-year ledger

Pentagon contract spending, FY2020–2024 · Hartung & Semler, Quincy Institute / Costs of War, July 2025 (constant FY2025 dollars)

All Pentagon contracts$2.4TThe five primes$771BDiplomacy + development + aid$356BThe five primes earned more than twice what the United States spent on diplomacy,development and humanitarian aid combined — over the same five years.Lockheed Martin alone: $313B — nearly the entire diplomacy budget by itself.
The military-industrial complex is not a metaphor. It is a line item, and the line item is the budget. Hartung & Semler, July 2025.

The Defense News Top 100 ranking for 2025 confirms the pecking order within the five. Lockheed Martin: $72.1 billion in annual defense revenue, the world's largest defense company by a wide margin. RTX: $46 billion. General Dynamics: $39.4 billion. Northrop Grumman: $37 billion. Boeing's defense segment: $35.7 billion — sixth globally, behind Britain's BAE Systems at $36 billion, the first non-American in the ranking. The top 100 combined: $700 billion, up 11.3% year-on-year. The war business is not cyclical at the top. It is structural.

What each throne sells

Lockheed Martin is the air-and-missile empire: the F-35 Lightning II — the most expensive weapons program in history — plus PAC-3 and THAAD missile defense under multi-year framework agreements that provide demand certainty beyond annual appropriation cycles. Even here, the ground shifts: the Air Force cut planned 2026 F-35 procurements by half as attention turned to next-generation air dominance platforms.

RTX — the renamed Raytheon Technologies — is the missile house: Patriot systems in global demand (a $1.7 billion sale to Spain in December 2025 alone), with a Raytheon-segment book-to-bill of 2.27x in 2025, meaning orders ran at more than twice the pace of deliveries. Its stock surged 63% in 2025, the year's standout prime.

Northrop Grumman builds the things that must never be used: the B-21 Raider stealth bomber and the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile — the land leg of the nuclear triad — plus a $1.4 billion deal to integrate battle command systems across allied missile networks in Poland.

General Dynamics owns the sea and the land: Virginia-class submarines (a $12.4 billion contract) and Abrams tanks, cushioned by Gulfstream business jets — roughly 45% of revenue — which make it the least defense-pure of the five.

Boeing Defense is the wounded giant: the defense unit bled on fixed-price contracts — the KC-46 tanker most famously — running negative margins while the commercial side recovered. It remains the outlier of the five, and the one the Pentagon watches most nervously.

Chart 2 · The order book

The future is already sold

Reported backlogs, $ billions · company filings and industry tallies, 2025

RTX$268BLockheed Martin$194BGeneral Dynamics$118BNorthrop Grumman$95.7BBoeing Defense$85BCombined: ~$800B — roughly two to three years of revenue, sold before it is built. Book-to-bill above 1.0x across the board.
A backlog is a promise the state has already signed. Elections change governments; they do not change these order books. Company filings; industry tallies 2025.

The five chiefs

Every pyramid has a head. At Lockheed Martin, James Taiclet — chairman, president and CEO — runs the world's largest defense company. At RTX, Christopher Calio, president and CEO, presides over the missile boom. At Northrop Grumman, Kathy Warden — chair, CEO and president — commands the nuclear-modernization franchise. At Boeing, Kelly Ortberg, president and CEO, inherited the defense unit's fixed-price wounds and the job of cauterizing them. At General Dynamics, Phebe Novakovic — chairman and CEO — runs the quietest of the five, the submarine-and-tank house that rarely makes headlines and always makes money.

Five Americans, five corner offices, one shared customer: the United States government. The primes are not vendors to the Pentagon. Vendors can be replaced. These are organs — and organs do not get voted out.

The customer is the state. The product is war. The dividend is permanent.

Where the record agrees — and where it argues

The consensus ledger below is the Bureau's hater-proofing. Everything printed above survived it; the disagreements are printed too.

  • Agreement: ~$2.4T in Pentagon contracts 2020–2024, 54% of DoD discretionary spending; the five primes took $771B; Lockheed $313B (Hartung & Semler, July 2025).
  • Agreement: Defense News Top 100 2025: $700B combined (+11.3%); Lockheed $72.1B #1, RTX $46B, GD $39.4B, Northrop $37B, Boeing Defense $35.7B.
  • Agreement: backlogs at record levels — RTX $268B, Lockheed $194B — with book-to-bill above 1.0x across the primes.
  • Dispute: efficiency vs. capture — the industry argues consolidation delivers scale and deterrence; critics argue it delivers cost-plus complacency and the KC-46 as exhibit A.
  • Dispute: whether the "peace dividend" was ever possible — supporters of the spending cite deterrence; the ledger cites the $356B diplomacy figure in reply.
  • Dispute: the challengers — Palantir's $10B Army deal and the "defense tech" wave may or may not dent the primes' moat; the backlog says not yet.

How this investigation was built

The Bureau's rule: every figure carries its source, and where sources disagree, both are printed.

  • Contract totals from Hartung & Semler, "War as Business"-series reporting, Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft / Costs of War (Brown University), July 2025, in constant FY2025 dollars.
  • Revenue rankings from the Defense News Top 100, 2025 edition (combined $700B; Lockheed $72.1B; RTX $46B; GD $39.4B; Northrop $37B; Boeing Defense $35.7B; BAE $36B).
  • Backlogs and margins from company 2025 filings and industry tallies (RTX $268B; LMT $194B; GD $118B; NOC $95.7B; Boeing Defense $85B).
  • Program specifics from 2025 reporting: F-35 procurement cut, Patriot sale to Spain ($1.7B), Virginia-class ($12.4B), Poland battle-command ($1.4B).

Eisenhower warned in 1961 of "unwarranted influence." The Bureau's finding: the influence is now warranted — by contract, by backlog, and by law. It is not a complex anymore. It is an organ.

Loading discussion…