Skip to main content Mali — Military Capability Assessment
Rankings · Power · Military

Mali — Military Capability Assessment

Force structure, readiness, power projection, and deterrence: the Bureau’s strategic assessment of Mali’s military capability — scored 0–100 across 24 causal dimensions.

#51Mali40.95/100
Military power rank#51 / 195
Assessment coverage61%
Inventory depthSummary
Why this score — the assessment, decomposed

The 40.95/100 rests first on Force mass (76.00), Land warfare (76.00), Combat experience (75.00). The binding constraints: Air power (8.00), Submarine force (8.00), Nuclear survivability (6.50) — in a causal model, capability can never rise above its weakest observed link. What would move the needle: Air power (8.00) — the weak link in the spending → equipment → readiness → capability chain.

  • Alliance architecture adds a +5.78 bonus.
  • Nuclear deterrence contributes a capped +0.81 bonus — it cannot manufacture top-tier conventional standing on its own.
  • Extreme defense burden applies an economic-strain penalty of −2.00.
  • Force mass is capped by what equipment, training and sustainment can actually support — headcount alone scores nothing.

10 of 24 dimensions could not be observed (Equipment quality, ISR & intelligence, Missile forces, Air defense, Cyber & space, Strategic lift…); missing data caps the score — it never inflates it.

The six sub-scores

Conventional capability37.05
Nuclear deterrence15.00
Power projection12.80
Sustainment70.00
Mobilization & regeneration58.46
Strategic resilience33.40

All 24 causal dimensions

Force mass Geographic & structural data · Bureau structural assessment76.00
Mobilization Bureau structural assessment · Conventional forces data47.94
Equipment qualitynot observed
Readiness & training Bureau structural assessment70.00
Command & control Geographic & structural data · Bureau structural assessment65.00
ISR & intelligencenot observed
Air power Bureau structural assessment8.00
Land warfare Geographic & structural data · Bureau structural assessment76.00
Naval power Bureau structural assessment12.80
Submarine force Bureau structural assessment8.00
Missile forcesnot observed
Air defensenot observed
Cyber & spacenot observed
Logistics Bureau structural assessment70.00
Strategic liftnot observed
Overseas basingnot observed
Expeditionary capabilitynot observed
Defense industrynot observed
Wartime productionnot observed
Combat experience Historical record75.00
Alliances Bureau structural assessment · Geographic & structural data48.12
Nuclear deterrence Nuclear taxonomy · Bureau structural assessment15.00
Nuclear survivability Bureau structural assessment · Nuclear taxonomy6.50
Geographic advantage Bureau structural assessment · Geographic & structural data31.70

Assessment coverage: 60.9% — 14 of 24 dimensions observed. Kernel v10, run 2026-10-04; evidence snapshot: CIA World Factbook 2026-09-28, SIPRI arms-producer revenue, v9 nuclear taxonomy.

Air power
Structured summary · assessment coverage 61%

Kernel assessment: Air power 8.00/100 (observed).

Recent acquisitions & orders (dated, sourced)

  • Bayraktar TB2 armed UAVs (first batch) — 8 in service (first deliveries Dec 2022) (in service)
    The Sentry (Dec 2022 reporting)
  • Russian military equipment: Su-25, Mi-24/35, Mi-8/17 helicopters, BMP-3, BTR-82A, drones — supplied to Wagner/Africa Corps-aligned forces since 2022 — None (ongoing since 2022; Wagner replaced by Africa Corps June 2025; Africa Corps consolidated around Bamako 2026)
    defence press / RFI Info Verif / envantärmedya (2022-2026)

Type-by-type inventory in preparation — this dossier deepens as coverage grows. Nothing here is estimated silently.

Land power
Structured summary · assessment coverage 61%

Kernel assessment: Land warfare 76.00/100 (observed).

Recent acquisitions & orders (dated, sourced)

  • CS/VP14 MRAP vehicles — 36 (first batch) (delivered Aug 2025)
    Military Africa, Aug 2025 source
  • VN22 infantry fighting vehicles — None (delivered (2025))
    defence press reporting (2025)
  • Russian armour delivery: T-72B3M main battle tanks, BMP-3 IFVs, BTR-82A APCs, Spartak/Linza/Tiger 4x4s, KamAZ trucks, D-30 howitzers — 100+ vehicles (7 T-72B3M, 5 BMP-3 per Defence Express count) (Delivered (convoy filmed in Bamako 17-18 Jan 2025))
    {'date': '5 February 2025', 'publication': 'IDN-InDepthNews (republishing DefenceWeb)', 'url': 'https://indepthnews.colo.ba.be/russia-delivers-military-hardware-to-mali-after-the-fall-of-assad-regime/'}

Type-by-type inventory in preparation — this dossier deepens as coverage grows. Nothing here is estimated silently.

Sea power
Structured summary · assessment coverage 61%

Kernel assessment: Naval power 12.80/100 (observed).

Type-by-type inventory in preparation — this dossier deepens as coverage grows. Nothing here is estimated silently.

Missiles & air defense
Structured summary · assessment coverage 61%

Missile forces could not be observed in this assessment — missing data caps the score, it is never treated as zero.

Type-by-type inventory in preparation — this dossier deepens as coverage grows. Nothing here is estimated silently.

Nuclear
Structured summary · assessment coverage 61%

Status: Non-nuclear-weapon state; party to the NPT

Nuclear deterrence15.00
Nuclear survivability6.50
Force structure — record

Armed forces

Malian Armed Forces (Forces Armées Maliennes or FAMa): Army (l’Armée de Terre), Air Force (l’Armée de l’Air); National Guard (la Garde Nationale du Mali); National Gendarmerie of Mali (Gendarmerie Nationale du Mali) (2025)

Personnel strength

information varies; estimated 35-40,000 active FAMa, Gendarmerie, and National Guard (2025)

Equipment

the FAMa's inventory includes mostly Soviet-era weapons and equipment along with smaller quantities of more modern material from a variety of suppliers, including France, Russia, South Africa, Türkiye, and the UAE (2025)

Service age & obligation

18 years of age for men and women for selective compulsory and voluntary military service; 24-month compulsory service obligation (2025)

Note

the FAMa is responsible for the defense of the country’s sovereignty and territory, but also has some domestic security duties, including the maintenance of public order and support to law enforcement; it also participates in socio-economic development projects; the military has traditionally played a large role in Mali’s politics; prior to the coup in August 2020 and military takeover in May 2021, it had intervened in the political arena at least five times since the country gained independence in 1960 (1968, 1976, 1978, 1991, 2012) the FAMa and other security forces are actively engaged in combat operations against several insurgent/terrorist groups affiliated with al-Qa'ida and the Islamic State of Iraq and ash-Sham (ISIS), as well as other armed rebel organizations, communal militias, and criminal bands spread across the central, northern, and southern regions of the country; a large portion of the country--up to 50% by some estimates--is outside of government control the FAMa and the remainder of the security forces collapsed in 2012 during the fighting against Tuareg rebels and Islamic militants and were rebuilt beginning in 2013 with external assistance from the EU and the UN; the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA) and the EU Training Mission in Mali (EUTM) ended their missions in 2023 and 2024, respectively; France intervened militarily in Mali in 2013 to assist with regaining the northern half of the country from rebel and Islamic militant groups; French troops withdrew in 2022; since 2021, Mali has increased security ties with Russia, which has provided equipment, training, and other forms of military support (2025)

Magna assessment

MILITARY POWER 40.95/100 — The Magna Military Power score is our 0–100 measure of causal military capability — 24 dimensions (mass, equipment, readiness, projection, industry, nuclear deterrence), aggregated through a dependency graph, never by simple addition.

Momentum 0 — Quarterly momentum: the Bureau's read on the country's trajectory over the last quarter, from −10 (deteriorating fast) to +10 (accelerating).

Steadiness was the quarter's defining trait: no rupture, no windfall, no surprise strong enough to move the score.

The trajectory remains set by fundamentals that change over years, not quarters — and this quarter changed little.

Related

Power indexMilitary indexLargest armiesMali — FactbookMali — RankingsLeader: Mali

Across the Bureau

Mali — Country ProfileDid Mali acquire Bayraktar TB2 armed UAVs?Did Mali acquire Bayraktar TB2 purchase?What are the main airports of Mali?History of Mali — TimelineAssimi Goïta — Leader of MaliMali Ranking — Magna Country RankingsWhat is the population of Mali?