Skip to main content Comoros — Military Capability Assessment
Rankings · Power · Military

Comoros — Military Capability Assessment

Force structure, readiness, power projection, and deterrence: the Bureau’s strategic assessment of Comoros’s military capability — scored 0–100 across 24 causal dimensions.

#102Comoros33.76/100
Military power rank#102 / 195
Assessment coverage61%
Inventory depthSummary
Why this score — the assessment, decomposed

The 33.76/100 rests first on Command & control (65.00), Force mass (60.00), Land warfare (60.00). The binding constraints: Air power (8.00), Submarine force (8.00), Nuclear survivability (6.50) — in a causal model, capability can never rise above its weakest observed link. What would move the needle: Air power (8.00) — the weak link in the spending → equipment → readiness → capability chain.

  • Alliance architecture adds a +5.78 bonus.
  • Nuclear deterrence contributes a capped +0.63 bonus — it cannot manufacture top-tier conventional standing on its own.
  • Force mass is capped by what equipment, training and sustainment can actually support — headcount alone scores nothing.

10 of 24 dimensions could not be observed (Equipment quality, ISR & intelligence, Missile forces, Air defense, Cyber & space, Strategic lift…); missing data caps the score — it never inflates it.

The six sub-scores

Conventional capability28.78
Nuclear deterrence15.00
Power projection22.80
Sustainment45.00
Mobilization & regeneration50.62
Strategic resilience26.45

All 24 causal dimensions

Force mass Geographic & structural data · Bureau structural assessment60.00
Mobilization Bureau structural assessment · Conventional forces data45.00
Equipment qualitynot observed
Readiness & training Bureau structural assessment45.00
Command & control Geographic & structural data · Bureau structural assessment65.00
ISR & intelligencenot observed
Air power Bureau structural assessment8.00
Land warfare Geographic & structural data · Bureau structural assessment60.00
Naval power Bureau structural assessment22.80
Submarine force Bureau structural assessment8.00
Missile forcesnot observed
Air defensenot observed
Cyber & spacenot observed
Logistics Bureau structural assessment45.00
Strategic liftnot observed
Overseas basingnot observed
Expeditionary capabilitynot observed
Defense industrynot observed
Wartime productionnot observed
Combat experience Historical record10.00
Alliances Bureau structural assessment · Geographic & structural data48.12
Nuclear deterrence Nuclear taxonomy · Bureau structural assessment15.00
Nuclear survivability Bureau structural assessment · Nuclear taxonomy6.50
Geographic advantage Bureau structural assessment · Geographic & structural data30.11

Assessment coverage: 60.9% — 14 of 24 dimensions observed. Kernel v10, run 2026-10-04; evidence snapshot: CIA World Factbook 2026-09-28, SIPRI arms-producer revenue, v9 nuclear taxonomy.

Air power
Structured summary · assessment coverage 61%

Kernel assessment: Air power 8.00/100 (observed).

Type-by-type inventory in preparation — this dossier deepens as coverage grows. Nothing here is estimated silently.

Land power
Structured summary · assessment coverage 61%

Kernel assessment: Land warfare 60.00/100 (observed).

Type-by-type inventory in preparation — this dossier deepens as coverage grows. Nothing here is estimated silently.

Sea power
Structured summary · assessment coverage 61%

Kernel assessment: Naval power 22.80/100 (observed).

Type-by-type inventory in preparation — this dossier deepens as coverage grows. Nothing here is estimated silently.

Missiles & air defense
Structured summary · assessment coverage 61%

Missile forces could not be observed in this assessment — missing data caps the score, it is never treated as zero.

Type-by-type inventory in preparation — this dossier deepens as coverage grows. Nothing here is estimated silently.

Nuclear
Structured summary · assessment coverage 61%

Status: Non-nuclear-weapon state; party to the NPT

Nuclear deterrence15.00
Nuclear survivability6.50
Force structure — record

Armed forces

National Army for Development (l'Armee Nationale de Developpement, AND): Comoran Defense Force (Force Comorienne de Defense or FCD; includes Comoran National Gendarmerie); Ministry of Interior: Coast Guard, Federal Police, National Directorate of Territorial Safety (customs and immigration) (2024)

Personnel strength

estimated 600 Defense Force; estimated 500 Federal Police (2023)

Equipment

the AND is lightly armed and equipped with small arms, a few light aircraft, and utility vehicles (2024)

Service age & obligation

18-25 years of age for voluntary military service for men and women; no conscription (2023)

Note

the focus for the security forces is search and rescue operations and maintaining internal security; a defense treaty with France provides naval resources for the protection of territorial waters, training of Comoran military personnel, and air surveillance; France maintains a small maritime base and a Foreign Legion contingent on neighboring Mayotte (2024)

Magna assessment

MILITARY POWER 33.76/100 — The Magna Military Power score is our 0–100 measure of causal military capability — 24 dimensions (mass, equipment, readiness, projection, industry, nuclear deterrence), aggregated through a dependency graph, never by simple addition.

Momentum 0 — Quarterly momentum: the Bureau's read on the country's trajectory over the last quarter, from −10 (deteriorating fast) to +10 (accelerating).

Jul–Sep 2026 came and went without leaving a mark on the country's trajectory. Continuity, not change, is the story.

For a small or mid-sized state, that is often the good outcome: no shock to absorb, no crisis to manage.

Related

Power indexMilitary indexLargest armiesComoros — FactbookComoros — RankingsLeader: Comoros

Across the Bureau

Comoros — Country ProfileDid Comoros acquire Military cooperation agreement?What are the main airports of Comoros?History of Comoros — TimelineAzali Assoumani — Leader of ComorosComoros Ranking — Magna Country RankingsWhat is the population of Comoros?Who is the president of Comoros?